Great idea. Except the "without any additional cost" part assumes the initial costing model is reasonable. People who start out selling multi-million dollar vehicles really don't give a damn about whether the customer is getting proportional value for their money at a subsistence level. They are typically going to believe in the "rising tide" theory of economics first, not a utilitarian one. Ford's perspective was that the people building his cars should be able to afford the cars. If CZinger puts most of the labor force out of work, then where's the employment going to come from for them to buy the cars? If most of the labor force is not building cars (or anything, for that matter), then what do they need cars for in the first place?

Tesla is a good example of "Cars are the dominant species": a world that is serving the desires of automobiles, rather than the needs of people and their children's places.