I want to highlight the whole article. Thank you. The "master's house" is the house of the mean Mean. The initial learning results of AI came out with some awful but truthful biases showing how mean humans are, so the commercial projects had to create filters to tone down the unfettered learning curve so that ChatGPT could be useful in the context of the Master's house (friendly to people).

"In a society based on competition, you get fewer and fewer winners and more and more losers." -Wendell Berry

ChatGPT has been modified to fit the model of the winners without thinking too much about the losers (almost everyone).

If we separate it from civilization (city-based colonialism) and feed it Nature's point of view, what will it tell us about human behavior?

Do we even need to do the ChatGPT step? No. We all can easily take a step back and look at human behaviors and activities from Nature's point of view: humans have become a rogue species of unfettered consumers with money replacing conscience (the Invisible Hand).

The competitive uselessness of our global capitalist civilization (pursuit of happiness) IS the core of our trauma because as we have devalued places, we also devalued the weakest among us as being without 'competitive' potential to make money for the Master's house except as exploiters of places.

This behavior isolates each human brain from a connection to its own future (food, land) except through money.

What greater trauma is there than severing the brain's connection to all of its physical body's abilities and senses?

If AI entities come to the same conclusion, will anyone actually listen? Over thousands of years, humans haven't listened to their other gods (unless they are war gods), so why would we start now?