I'm not usually one to say we need more studies, but as an engineering tech, I would have liked to see what it would look like to model a photographic negative of the sky in the long and short wavelengths year-round worldwide. In other words, instead of all the heat input models, a holistic heat loss 3D view to see the radiative black body picture going into the celestial sphere seen from all the surface points of Earth through the atmosphere, and how it changed over time. Thinking in terms of a global average ( CO2 based in Hawaii) is like doing the math based on a point source, and as the differential heat flow charts show, is inaccurate and misleading. Much like using the differential between the equator and south pole when the heat flow actually is going to the currents and winds at 75?degS, not 90deg, while 90 is the real cold sink we are prejudiced toward. Then, there's the 24hr vs diurnal effects when the AMOC slows. Too many variables are averaged and consolidated for nature and too few are averaged for humans (individual carbon choices vs global consumerism/capitalism/money/energy).

Every dollar is a food-based dollar.

It just looks like petroleum for now.