Technically, if you give the benefit of the doubt, you're not wrong. They're rich and successful, so they can't be all bad, right? Unfortunately, the same doesn't apply to the typical American consumer-competitor when it comes to intent and conditioning. Those winners at the controls (left and right) are playing a no-win market scenario that manipulates the ignorance , beliefs and fears of neotonized groups in order to gain votes, while actual feudalists like Koch, Olin, Uhlein, etc are funding anything that increases disparity between them and humanists (I'm not a big fan of the latter, but they are a sight better than theists). These dark money players have been fighting anything that interferes with pure competitive exploitation ever since they got smacked down by Teddy Roosevelt's anti-trust laws (which he appropriated for populist reasons, not morality). I think that we have to let the game play out because neither of our major parties really knows where to step going forward. The corporates favor data and efficiency, which looks cold and inhuman, but the leftists don't actually do the real math of natural resources and infrastructure. Our blind Competition mindset is missing the physics and usefulness that the future needs. There's not nearly as much intention as is imagined, and too much inertia/complexity is masking systemic dependencies. Many of the "anti-government" voters don't understand how they are played by oligarchs to bilk taxpayers out of services, and the pro-rights voters don't understand how they are being divided with special causes as bullies get away with murder(health insurance, poverty-based crime culture). Efficiency, indeed.