The question to first ask is, "What are people for?" If we don't have a useful purpose for human agency that contributes more to our environment than we consume, there's really no point in arguing about what amount of money or who gets it. It's not the capitalism: it's the resource destruction. The opposite of consumption is not frugality or redistribution: it's generosity to Place.
Humanity owes Earth about a million years of back wages, and as we face Nature's bankruptcy judgement, the bankrupt species is busy drilling for more credit instead of learning to live with less and pay off the debt.